“Jurisdiction in respect of all offences which can be committed in cyberspace is expanded substantially in terms of the bill. This is mainly to deal with cybercrime, which originates from outside our borders,” said Deputy Minister Jeffery.The bill also puts in place specialised procedures. These include sufficient checks and balances, to protect the rights of an accused person. It also protects other users of information communication technologies to deal with the investigation of cybercrimes. Deputy Minister Jeffery said many cybercrimes originate from another country. As such, the bill further provides for procedures which facilitate mutual assistance with other countries in the investigation of cybercrimes.
“Provision is made in the bill for an interim protection order pending finalisation of criminal proceedings. In terms of the protection order, a court may prohibit any person from distributing the data message. Or, may order an electronic communications service provider, or person in control of a computer system, to remove or disable access to the data message in question,” Deputy Minister Jeffery explained.The bill also inserts a new section in the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 227. This to criminalise the harmful disclosure of pornography. The Deputy Minister also addressed the misconceptions surrounding the role of the State Security Agency. The Agency has been assigned a role to coordinate the implementation of the cybersecurity initiative of government.
“The additional structures, which need to be established within the State Security Agency, do not give any powers to agency to control the internet,” he said.He further addressed misconceptions around the interception of data and allegations that the bill increases the State’s surveillance powers.
“In order to prove an offence in a court of law, data must be seized as evidence material. If the State cannot seize evidential material to adduce as evidence, it is impossible to prove the guilt of an accused person.”